Technological unemployment has featured in debates since the Industrial Revolution. But whereas machinery in the 19th century took over physical tasks, AI – particularly GenAI – encroaches upon intellectual and creative capabilities.

We recently hosted a webinar where we discussed the steps a researcher should take after publishing, to ensure their research receives the attention it deserves. During the session— hosted by Sean Scarisbrick, featuring publishing experts Juliane Baron, Michael Todd and Sophie Boddington— attendees discovered practical strategies to empower themselves to make a real difference in shaping policies that matter.
Here are some answers to the great questions we were unable to answer during the session:

As a journal editor, understanding and using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) is crucial to achieving your goals. While many of us are familiar with KPIs, it’s important to dig deeper into what they really mean for journal management and how you can make them work for your specific needs.

In the article “Plant-people intimacies” I discuss that while humans produce plants via agriculture, plants also produce people; mediated by the plantation, plants produce humans, first as labor, then as race.

In today’s workplace, diversity and inclusion aren’t just buzzwords – they are essential for creating environments where employees feel valued and engaged. Adopting inclusive workplace policies is not only the right thing to do, but it has also become a strategic priority in an increasingly competitive labor market, where organizations are competing to attract and retain the best talent.

So, for those who attended the webinar, or those who’d like insight into Open Access, we’ve collated our answers to the questions below.

Last year, the U.S. Surgeon General declared social isolation and loneliness as a public health emergency, drawing urgent attention to an epidemic that harms both physical and mental well-being. Studies suggest that social factors—including our relationships—impact 40% to 80% of health outcomes, making social connection a critical pillar of wellness. In fact, individuals with strong social ties have a 50% greater chance of survival than those with weaker connections, while social isolation poses risks as serious as smoking 15 cigarettes daily. In contrast, meaningful social connection and a sense of purpose are shown to be protective factors, enhancing quality of life and even increasing survival rates.

Our upcoming How to Be a Peer Reviewer webinar in November will focus on how to conduct peer review of clinical research. Be sure to register here before the webinar goes live on November 6th. 

There was a time when some of the most high-profile bioethical issues involved physicians trying to save lives and provide treatments that patients or their families didn’t want.

As AI voice assistants like Amazon Alexa and Google Home become increasingly integrated in various aspects of our daily lives, an intriguing question arises: How do the distinct characteristics of these voices shape our perceptions and influence our behavior?

Technological unemployment has featured in debates since the Industrial Revolution. But whereas machinery in the 19th century took over physical tasks, AI – particularly GenAI – encroaches upon intellectual and creative capabilities.

Early in my career, my first concern in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit had always been the survival of my patient. Until this question from a mother whose child I had been following forever changed my perception and my career. “Happy we are going home but how am I supposed to care for him? I’m a mess!”

In the article “Plant-people intimacies” I discuss that while humans produce plants via agriculture, plants also produce people; mediated by the plantation, plants produce humans, first as labor, then as race.

In today’s workplace, diversity and inclusion aren’t just buzzwords – they are essential for creating environments where employees feel valued and engaged. Adopting inclusive workplace policies is not only the right thing to do, but it has also become a strategic priority in an increasingly competitive labor market, where organizations are competing to attract and retain the best talent.

Last year, the U.S. Surgeon General declared social isolation and loneliness as a public health emergency, drawing urgent attention to an epidemic that harms both physical and mental well-being. Studies suggest that social factors—including our relationships—impact 40% to 80% of health outcomes, making social connection a critical pillar of wellness. In fact, individuals with strong social ties have a 50% greater chance of survival than those with weaker connections, while social isolation poses risks as serious as smoking 15 cigarettes daily. In contrast, meaningful social connection and a sense of purpose are shown to be protective factors, enhancing quality of life and even increasing survival rates.

Our upcoming How to Do Research and Get Published webinar, taking place on November 12th, will focus on ‘How to promote your article and impact policy.’ Register here to secure your spot before it goes live. 

There was a time when some of the most high-profile bioethical issues involved physicians trying to save lives and provide treatments that patients or their families didn’t want.

As AI voice assistants like Amazon Alexa and Google Home become increasingly integrated in various aspects of our daily lives, an intriguing question arises: How do the distinct characteristics of these voices shape our perceptions and influence our behavior?

In today's evolving educational landscape, understanding diverse learning theories and integrating critical thinking into teacher training is more essential than ever. These were key topics in this Teacher Talk Radio podcast episode, hosted by Hannah Wilson, featuring Sage author Dr Andy Goldhawk.

The first 1,000 days of a human life are the foundation for a healthy life in the longer term. But what if those first 1,000 days are complicated and your life starts earlier than outside the womb? After birth, human milk plays a key role in the long-term health benefits for the newborn.

Contrary to the common caricature, the academic world has long been defined more by tech than by tweed. From the typewriting of manuscripts in the 60s to the launch of the first online humanities journal, Postmodern Culture, in 1990,and the founding of JSTOR  in 1994, scholarship has consistently embraced contemporary innovations in ways that enhance its rigour and reach.

Over the years, many innovations have reshaped the industry, and advancements in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) are emerging as another transformative force, with the potential to significantly impact scholarly research and publication.

Interest in research integrity and ethics in academic publishing has skyrocketed in recent years. With the rise of paper mills, AI, and a news story almost every week about data manipulation scandals, it’s no surprise that the academic community is increasingly focused on these issues. This newfound attention has led to a rise in research integrity startups - companies creating research integrity tools in the hopes of combatting these modern threats.

As we approach the third anniversary of Sage Journals’ Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) pledge, our team would like to share observations, reflections, and hopes for the future of our journals program. Sage established a taskforce in mid-2020 to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within our research publishing. In 2021, we pledged to amplify diverse voices, increase representation, and heighten the visibility and impact of our research. We recognized that educating ourselves and others was vital to this commitment and have consistently enacted initiatives and policies to foster the continuous development of our journals.   

The realm of neurological research is witnessing an unprecedented wave of innovation, reshaping our understanding and treatment of complex disorders. From gene therapy to brain-computer interfaces, the scope of advancements is broad, each promising a brighter future for patients worldwide. Here, we explore the cutting-edge technologies and methodologies defining this new era.

There are many perks associated with being an Editorial Board member on a Sage Journal. They include the opportunity to be actively engaged in the publishing process, review innovative manuscripts, chances to upskill and advance your career, rewards and exclusive opportunities and more.  

The 2024 Clarivate Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and impact factors (IF) have been released recently. These reports are a resource that ranks journals by field, giving researchers, institutions, and publishers one way to assess their significance in the global research landscape.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly built into technologies that we use in our everyday lives, and while it seems benign to use AI to delete an unwanted object from the background of a photo or draft a contract, the stakes are much higher when AI is brought into the field of medical imaging and the health of patients is impacted.

As a researcher, it can be challenging to showcase the real-world impact of academic work. Fortunately, Sage Policy Profiles offers a solution to this problem. The free-to-use, browser-based tool lets researchers see how their work has been cited in policy documents, and then easily illustrate and share its impact graphically. In this blog post, we’ll look at how Sage Policy Profiles works and how you can use it to make an impact with your research.

We recently hosted a webinar where we discussed the steps a researcher should take after publishing, to ensure their research receives the attention it deserves. During the session— hosted by Sean Scarisbrick, featuring publishing experts Juliane Baron, Michael Todd and Sophie Boddington— attendees discovered practical strategies to empower themselves to make a real difference in shaping policies that matter.
Here are some answers to the great questions we were unable to answer during the session:

As a journal editor, understanding and using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) is crucial to achieving your goals. While many of us are familiar with KPIs, it’s important to dig deeper into what they really mean for journal management and how you can make them work for your specific needs.

This month, we hosted a webinar to help academics who work in clinical medicine through the process of becoming a peer reviewer.

So, for those who attended the webinar, or those who’d like insight into Open Access, we’ve collated our answers to the questions below.

Our upcoming How to Do Research and Get Published webinar, taking place on November 12th, will focus on ‘How to promote your article and impact policy.’ Register here to secure your spot before it goes live. 

Our upcoming How to Be a Peer Reviewer webinar in November will focus on how to conduct peer review of clinical research. Be sure to register here before the webinar goes live on November 6th. 

Contrary to the common caricature, the academic world has long been defined more by tech than by tweed. From the typewriting of manuscripts in the 60s to the launch of the first online humanities journal, Postmodern Culture, in 1990,and the founding of JSTOR  in 1994, scholarship has consistently embraced contemporary innovations in ways that enhance its rigour and reach.

Over the years, many innovations have reshaped the industry, and advancements in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) are emerging as another transformative force, with the potential to significantly impact scholarly research and publication.

Interest in research integrity and ethics in academic publishing has skyrocketed in recent years. With the rise of paper mills, AI, and a news story almost every week about data manipulation scandals, it’s no surprise that the academic community is increasingly focused on these issues. This newfound attention has led to a rise in research integrity startups - companies creating research integrity tools in the hopes of combatting these modern threats.

Since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022, there has been concern among educators, authors, editors, and reviewers about the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in writing research papers. An influx of “AI Detectors” appeared online seemingly overnight, claiming to identify content not written by an actual human. These new tools sparked a wave of emails from reviewers and authors asserting that the paper or review they were looking at was written by AI, based on these detectors’ results.